| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Introduction: Features Cyber space has been provided with anonymity due to its marvelous capabilities and, the ease of committing crime, the transgression of crimes, reduction of the age of the perpetrators, the extent of the damage and the plight of the victim. The barriers to cybercrime prevention will be effective in using effective strategies to control these capabilities. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to identify the most important obstacles to the realization of cybercrime prevention. Method: The present study was conducted from a methodological point of view, with a qualitative approach. The interviewed research participants include all experts in the field of crime prevention in the judiciary and other organizations. Sampling was done purposefully and continued until theoretical saturation. The data was analyzed using "thematic analysis" method. In order to ensure the validity of research data, the views of professors of the scholars in the field of research were used, while the text of the interviews along with the codes was available to a number of experts, and after confirmation, the analysis of the interviews continued. Findings: According to research findings, the main obstacles to the realization of cyber crime prevention are seven main areas of social barriers, structural barriers, educational barriers, cultural barriers, administrative barriers, judicial barriers and technical barriers. Based on the number of obstacles encountered in each area, barriers in the area of management include 27 obstacles, legal and judicial barriers including 19 barriers, cultural barriers including 18 obstacles, technical obstacles including 13 barriers, structural barriers including 9 obstacles, scientific obstacles Training including 3 obstacles and social barriers also includes 3 obstacles. Conclution: According to the research findings, to prevent cyber crime, two levels can be used to remove barriers: First, through strategic and long-term measures through planning, policy-making and decision-making at the macro level of the country should reduce crimes of this area . The second, through direct or indirect action, systematically regulates early-action measures to prevent the spread of crime in cyberspace. |